Minoa Research · August 2026
The Audience of One
The State of B2B Buying Behavior 2026
Enterprise purchases are decided by groups, but almost everything sellers produce is built for individuals. New data on the cheapest correction available to any sales team.
8 pages · 6 findings
Foreword
“I gave this advice in 2017. Somebody finally measured it.”
In 2017 I wrote a two-part piece called Show Me The Money. The last piece of advice in it was this: socialize your case with as many people as possible.
If you drop an ROI analysis into a proposal to justify your pricing and the customer hasn’t participated in the building of it, you’ve wasted your time. When they see it they think, “Where did these numbers come from? Will I get these same results? They must be doing this so they don’t have to negotiate with us. Couldn’t we get the same benefits from the competition?” To them it feels like they are being sold to versus partnering with you. And when you leave the room they toss your analysis into the trash. On the other hand, when you include the customer in building the case, they lean in. They get you the best inputs, they make assumptions they can defend, they verify the improvement rates to expect. This is when the transfer of ownership occurs. It moves from the vendor’s business case and becomes the customer’s. Once their fingerprints are on it, there is nothing left to attack. That skepticism becomes conviction.
None of that was theory to me. I built and led the value organizations at Splunk, Databricks and Harness, and have done more than a thousand business cases myself. The number was consistent: opportunities with a customer-approved business case won at nearly five times the rate of those without one.
But win rates only tell you what happened at the end of the process, not what happened inside the document along the way. No prior study could see that either. They all relied on what buyers and sellers remembered.
This report goes deep inside the process. Minoa looked inside the business cases themselves as they were being built. They looked at who opened them, how many people, and how much time they spent. A case read by a second person on the buyer’s side wins substantially more often than one read by a single champion, and the effect holds when reading time is held constant. It is not attention. It is how many people had to reconcile the same numbers with each other.
I have spent a career telling sellers to socialize the case. On this evidence, I was clearly underselling it. It’s not a best practice, it’s a requirement.
Doug May
Founder & Managing Director, Value Sherpas
01 · The Setup
Twenty-two people are reading over your champion's shoulder.
The decision unit in a typical enterprise purchase is 13 internal stakeholders and 9 external participants. The seller usually knows two of them.
| Stakeholder group | Count |
|---|---|
| Internal stakeholders | 13 |
| External participants | 9 |
| Total buying group | 22 |
74%
of buying teams show unhealthy conflict during the decision: conflicting objectives, open disagreement, or being overruled from outside the room.
Forrester, State of Business Buying 2026 · ~18,000 buyers; Gartner, May 2025 · n=632
02 · The Tension
Personalization is making it worse.
The profession's biggest investment of the past decade (content tailored to individual stakeholders) actively fractures the group whose agreement decides whether anything gets bought.
| Content approach | Impact on group consensus |
|---|---|
| Content tailored to individuals | −59% |
| Content relevant to the group | +20% |
Gartner, May 2025 · n=632 B2B buyers
03 · The Turn
One more reader is worth 10–15 points of win rate.
What travels between people is a shared set of numbers. When a second person on the buyer's side opens the business case, win rate jumps, and the effect holds when matched by contract value, company size, and total reading time.
| Buyer-side readers | Win rate |
|---|---|
| 1 reader | 39% |
| 2 readers | 53% |
| 3–4 readers | 55% |
Minoa Research, July 2026 · n=818 closed B2B deals
04 · The Price
Deals aren't lost to competitors. They're lost to nobody.
61%
of lost deals are lost to indecision
14%
are lost to a competitor
Ebsta × Pavilion · 4.2m opportunities across 530 companies
Indecision is what happens when twenty-two people can't assemble a shared reason to spend money. Yet the instrument that produces one is almost never built: under 1% of deals carry a business case, while roughly half of closed deals above $100k do. Matched by deal size, the deals with a case win.
| Deal size | Win rate without a business case | Win rate with a business case |
|---|---|---|
| $100–500k | 23% | 42% |
| Above $500k | 26% | 58% |
Minoa Research, July 2026 · n≈1,000,000 deals
05 · The Feasibility
Co-created beats broadcast.
The bottleneck that kept business cases rare has broken. The work moved from a handful of specialists to the reps themselves, and output doubled without anyone working harder.
⅓ → 60%
rep share of business-case builders, in 18 months
2×
total output, with the median builder's workload flat
51%
of buyers expect misleading information from generative AI. Co-created, traceable numbers win trust
Minoa Research, July 2026; Gartner, May 2026 · n=645
06 · The Landing
You cannot personalize your way to consensus. The cheapest correction is a business case more than one person has read.
Read the full reportAbout the Contributors

Max Elster
Co-founder & CEO, Minoa

Richard Einhorn
Co-founder & CTO, Minoa

Doug May
Founder & MD, Value Sherpas

Get the full report
All six findings, the method behind them, and every chart. Free as a PDF.